MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158084138 · doi:10.1109/icc.1997.595009

An adaptive Gaussian sum algorithm for radar tracking

2002· article· en· W2158084138 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtended Kalman filterKalman filterInvariant extended Kalman filterGaussianRadar trackerAlgorithmComputer scienceEnsemble Kalman filterFast Kalman filterAdaptive filterGaussian filterPosition (finance)Tracking (education)RadarMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a new radar tracking algorithm based on the Gaussian sum filter. We have developed a new systematic and efficient way to approximate a non-Gaussian and measurement-dependent function by a weighted sum of Gaussian density functions. We have derived the formula for updating the weights involved in the bank of Kalman-type filters and also suggested a way to alleviate the growing memory problem inherent in the Gaussian sum filter. Our method is compared with the extended Kalman filter (EKF) and the converted measurement Kalman filter (CMKF) and it is shown to be more accurate in term of position and velocity errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it