MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158089687 · doi:10.1306/13371585st641173

Advanced Seismic-stratigraphic Imaging of Depositional Elements in a Lower Cretaceous (Mannville) Heavy Oil Reservoir, West-central Saskatchewan, Canada

2013· book-chapter· en· W2158089687 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sabrina E. Sarzalejo Silva, Bruce S. Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Petroleum Geologists eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsOil sandsGeologyAsphaltCretaceousResource (disambiguation)Steam-assisted gravity drainageSedimentary depositional environmentGeochemistryMineral resource classificationOil reservesMining engineeringEarth sciencePaleontologyPetroleumPetroleum engineeringArchaeologyGeographyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We integrated core, wire-line logs, a three-dimensional (3-D) seismic volume, and a seismic attribute-derived 3-D lithology volume to define the stratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group for a small area in Saskatchewan. The lithology volume was generated by integrating the seismic data with wire-line logs through the use of a probabilistic neural network. The stratigraphic interpretation was an iterative process: first, based on wire-line logs and cores; then, based on the integration of well and 3-D seismic data; and finally, by integrating the attribute-derived lithology volume with the other data sets. Integration of the lithology volume into our stratigraphic interpretation, along with the exploitation of seismic-based visualization technologies, helped us to construct a better geologic model than what could have been constructed using only well data or conventional seismic-stratigraphic analysis techniques. Unfortunately, despite the high-frequency content (and good to excellent quality of the data), meter-scale variations of lithology in the primary reservoir interval could not be detected seismically because of the low acoustic-impedance contrasts between the various lithologies in this interval. Various types of noise in the seismic data also degraded the attribute-based property prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Petroleum Geologists eBooksSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207