MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158113978 · doi:10.1109/mper.2001.4311176

Experimental Performance Evaluation of a Wavelet-Based on-Line Voltage Detection Method for Power Quality Applications

2001· article· en· W2158113978 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Mokhtari, Masoud Karimi-Ghartemani, Mohammad Reza Iravani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltageWaveletPower qualityComputer sciencePower (physics)Line (geometry)Set (abstract data type)Scheme (mathematics)Electric power systemElectronic engineeringQuality (philosophy)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article evaluates the performance of a wavelet-based, on-line (real-time) voltage detection scheme for power quality applications. The objectives are (1) to demonstrate suitability of the proposed method in detecting faults/disturbances in a power system and (2) to compare its performance with that of a conventional scheme. Two static transfer switch (STS) systems are chosen as frameworks for comparison; a low-voltage laboratory STS set-up for which measured results are provided, and a medium-voltage STS system for which detection times are derived based on simulation, using the EMTDC/PSCAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering ReviewSame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207