From Subjects to Citizens: A Hundred Years of Citizenship in Australia and Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From Subjects to Citizens: A Hundred Years of Citizenship in Australia and Canada , Pierre Boyer, Linda Cardinal and David Headon, eds., Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2004, pp. xvi, 328. Citizenship is no longer viewed as a concept restricted to the relationship between an individual and the state. It is now seen as encompassing the series of overlapping identities that define an individual's relationship to a political community. This means that discussions of citizenship are now likely to involve an examination of individual and group rights, political participation and an individual's sense of belonging. The collection of conferences papers under review pushes this expanded notion of citizenship to its limits, and beyond. While the nominal topic is “a hundred years of citizenship in Australia and Canada,” the contents of the book include chapters on the Australian exploration of Antarctica, Nellie Melba as a famous Australian, the secret ballot and the franchise in Australia, government sponsorship of culture in Canada, and a fascinating (if depressing) study of evidentiary law relating to rape in two early twentieth-century cases. In addition to the startling range of topics, the styles of analysis and disciplinary backgrounds of the contributions vary widely, from literary to mainstream social science. A few chapters are more notable for their polemical approach than their content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".