MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158152796 · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32683-4

Postpartum Pain Relief: A Randomized Comparison of Self-Administered Medication and Standard Administration

2007· article· en· W2158152796 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nathalie East, Johanne Dubé, Élaine Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Saint-Luc
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdministration (probate law)Randomized controlled trialSelf-administrationPain reliefAnesthesiaPhysical therapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To compare pain relief in postpartum women receiving analgesia administered by nurses with the relief achieved by use of self-administered medication (SAM). METHOD: This randomized trial included women in spontaneous or induced labour or admitted for elective Caesarean section (CS). Women were stratified according to the mode of delivery. In the standard group, nurses administered the medications. In the SAM group, women kept the medications at the bedside and recorded each dose. The women were asked to record their pain level with a validated scale before and one hour after the administration of analgesia. A global pain score was calculated using the mean of these scores, and the satisfaction of patients and nurses with the process was recorded. RESULTS: We recruited 345 women for the study. Eleven women (3.15 %) were lost to follow-up. We analyzed data from 197 women in the vaginal delivery arm and 133 women in the CS arm. There was no difference between the global pain scores before and one hour after the administration of analgesia in each group, independent of the mode of delivery. Women who used SAM and had a vaginal delivery were significantly more likely to have used no medication (P = 0.02) or to have used acetaminophen (P = 0.008), and fewer of these women took naproxen (P = 0.05). No significant difference was seen in women who had CS. Narcotic use was similar in each group. Women who used SAM were more likely to indicate that they would choose this method again and recommend it to others. The level of satisfaction with SAM expressed by nurses did not change after the study. CONCLUSION: Postpartum pain relief was similar for women who had standard administration of medication by nurses and those who had SAM. More women using SAM used either no medication or acetaminophen only, and more women using SAM were highly satisfied with their method of pain relief. Use of self-administered medication should be considered for every postpartum unit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207