Bibliographic record
Abstract
Visual Fields at School-Age in Children Treated with Vigabatrin in Infancy. Gaily E, Jonsson H, Lappi M. Epilepsia 2009;50(2):206–216. PURPOSE: The use of vigabatrin (VGB) as an antiepileptic drug (AED) has been limited by evidence showing that it causes vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss (VAVFL) in at least 20–40% of patients exposed at school age or later. VGB is an effective drug for infantile spasms, but there are no reports on later visual field testing after such treatment. Our aim was to investigate the risk of VAVFL in school-age children who had received VGB in infancy. METHODS: Visual fields of 16 children treated with VGB for infantile spasms were examined by Goldmann kinetic perimetry at age 6–12 years. Normal fields were defined as the temporal meridian extending to more than 70°, and mild VAVFL between 50 and 70°. Abnormal findings were always confirmed by repeating the test. Exposure data were collected from hospital charts. RESULTS: Vigabatrin was started at a mean age of 7.6 (range, 3.2–20.3) months. The mean duration of therapy was 21.0 (9.3–29.8) months and cumulative dose 655 g (209–1,109 g). Eight children were never treated with other AEDs, five received only adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) in addition to VGB, and three children had been treated with other AEDs. Fifteen children had normal visual fields. Mild VAVFL was observed in one child (6%) who had been treated with VGB for 19 months and who received a cumulative dose of 572 g. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of VAVFL may be lower in children who are treated with VGB in infancy compared to patients who receive VGB at a later age. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormalities Associated with Vigabatrin in Patients with Epilepsy. Wheless JW, Carmant L, Bebin M, Conry JA, Chiron C, Elterman RD, Frost M, Paolicchi JM, Donald Shields W, Thiele EA, Zupanc ML, Collins SD. Epilepsia 2009;50(2):195–205. PURPOSE: Vigabatrin used to treat infantile spasms (IS) has been associated with transient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities. We carried out a retrospective review to better characterize the frequency of those abnormalities in IS and in children and adults treated with vigabatrin for refractory complex partial seizures (CPS). METHODS: Medical records and 332 cranial MRIs from 205 infants (aged ≤24 months) with IS treated at 10 sites in the United States and Canada were collected. Similarly, 2,074 images from 668 children (aged 2–16 years) and adults (aged >16 years) with CPS were re-reviewed. Prespecified MRI abnormalities were defined as any hyperintensity on T2-weighted or fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequences with or without diffusion restriction not readily explained by a radiographically well-characterized pathology. MRIs were read by two neuroradiologists blinded to treatment group. The incidence and prevalence of MRI abnormalities associated with vigabatrin were estimated. RESULTS: Among infants with IS, the prevalence of prespecified MRI abnormalities was significantly higher among vigabatrin-treated versus vigabatrin-naive subjects (22% vs. 4%; p < 0.001). Of nine subjects in the prevalence population with at least one subsequent determinate MRI, resolution of MRI abnormalities occurred in six (66.7%)—vigabatrin was discontinued in four. Among adults and children treated with vigabatrin for CPS, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence or prevalence of prespecified MRI abnormalities between vigabatrin-exposed and vigabatrin-naive subjects. DISCUSSION: Vigabatrin is associated with transient, asymptomatic MRI abnormalities in infants treated for IS. The majority of these MRI abnormalities resolved, even in subjects who remained on vigabatrin therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".