Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la foulée de la Révolution, le patrimoine culturel immatériel a fait l’objet d’un débat houleux en Tunisie. Il faut notamment penser aux expressions vestimentaires, artistiques, corporelles, culinaires et festives. Ce débat qui a donné lieu à quelques évènements violents, témoigne d’un malaise qui présidait depuis des décennies au rapport des Tunisiens au passé et à la mémoire collective. Autant dire qu’il renvoie à une crise latente qui n’a jamais été résolue et qui a éclaté telle une bombe à retardement en pleine face de tout le monde dès que l’autorité de l’État n’a plus été en mesure de la contenir par la force de la censure et de l’oppression. Afin de mieux saisir la teneur de ce bouleversement qui a divisé la Tunisie postrévolutionnaire entre modernistes et traditionnalistes, cet article fait état des expressions culturelles à la lumière desquelles le patrimoine culturel immatériel a été interpellé et disputé entre ces deux clans depuis la Révolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".