Association between MSH4 (MutS homologue 4) and the DNA strand-exchange RAD51 and DMC1 proteins during mammalian meiosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During meiotic prophase, chromosomes must undergo highly regulated recombination events, some of which lead to reciprocal exchanges. In yeast, MSH4, a meiosis-specific homologue of the bacterial MutS protein, is required for meiotic recombination. In mice, disruption of the Msh4 gene results in male and female infertility due to meiotic failure. To date, the implication of MSH4 mutations has not been established in human sterility. However, it is noteworthy that mutant mice exhibit a defect in the chromosome synapsis, strikingly similar to the clinical observations found in human infertility. As a step towards understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of MSH4 in human gametogenesis, we decided to determine whether this protein interacts with recombination machinery enzymes. Our results provide biochemical evidence indicating that the human MSH4 protein physically interacts with both RAD51 and DMC1, two RecA homologues known to initiate DNA strand-exchange between homologous chromosomes. Immunolocalization analyses show that some MSH4 foci, located on mouse meiotic chromosomes, colocalize with DMC1/RAD51 complexes. Our data support the view that MSH4 is associated with the early meiotic recombination machinery in mammals. We consider the possibility that MSH4 is involved in the regulation of recombination events by exerting a function closely after DNA strand-exchange has been initiated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".