MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158195655 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.381

Synchronization of Weak Indoor GPS Signals with Doppler Using a Segmented Matched Filter and Accumulation

2007· article· en· W2158195655 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce Tang, D.E. Dodds

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemGPS signalsComputer scienceDoppler effectMultipath propagationAssisted GPSWirelessReal-time computingMatched filterOffset (computer science)Bandwidth (computing)Filter (signal processing)TelecommunicationsPhysicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates GPS codephase acquisition with very low SNR signals found within large buildings. Conventional GPS receivers can acquire the GPS codephase relatively easily when in direct line of sight with the satellites. However, acquisition becomes difficult with highly attenuated signals found inside buildings. Recent government regulations aim to improve 911 service for wireless telephones by supplying dispatchers with caller location, however, this requires the development of new technologies. With extensive signal averaging, GPS signals can provide positioning within large buildings. We assume 5dB/floor of signal attenuation so the GPS signal would be -183 dBWor less at the bottom of a 5-story building. We assume 2 MHz system bandwidth and surrounding walls at room temperature of 290 K (17degC) so the Boltzmann noise is -141 dBW. More than 50 dB SNR improvement is provided by an accumulating segmented matched filter that is robust to polarity reversals caused by Doppler frequency offset and by GPS data transitions. Through simulation, performance comparisons are made to a conventional matched filter (CMF) operating without polarity reversals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207