Mobilisations transfrontières et Union européenne : difficultés et réalités de la contestation syndicale. L’exemple du syndicalisme des transports
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article examine les difficultés, pour l’eurosyndicalisme naissant, d’organiser des actions collectives de solidarité transfrontalière dans le nouvel espace politique et économique de l’Union européenne (UE). Ces actions restent très peu nombreuses malgré l’ampleur des réformes socio-économiques menées par l’Europe communautaire depuis plus de 20 ans, qui affectent profondément le contenu tant de l’organisation que des conditions de travail et des droits sociaux collectifs. Cependant, alors que le secteur du transport est soumis à de vives pressions concurrentielles, les structures syndicales transnationales de ce secteur réussissent à mobiliser de façon récurrente les salariés en créant des liens entre les différents métiers, tranchant ainsi avec une situation syndicale générale où l’européanisation de la contestation sociale ne semble pas être à l’ordre du jour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".