MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158222299 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2006.1693709

An efficient regular matrix inversion circuit architecture for MIMO processing

2006· article· en· W2158222299 on OpenAlexaff
Isabelle Laroche, Sébastien Roy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)AlgorithmInversion (geology)Iterative methodField-programmable gate arrayInverseMIMOSystolic arrayCovariance matrixParallel computingMathematicsVery-large-scale integrationComputer hardwareEmbedded systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel circuit architecture and algorithm is presented for the efficient implementation of a matrix inversion unit. The division-free algorithm yields a scaled version of the inverse and the scaling factor. Based on the Sherman-Morrison formula, the proposed architecture is characterized by regular, locally-connected arrays of processing units and simple iterative processing. It is especially well-suited for covariance matrices, or any other matrix which can be constructed from rank-one updates of an initial matrix whose inverse is known. While it constitutes an ideal solution for antenna array MMSE (minimum mean-square error) processing, it can also be generalized to many other applications with little effort. Implementation results of a heavily pipelined matrix inverter on a Xilinx Virtex-II FPGA are presented, including cost in logic slices and maximum clock frequency. The cost/complexity of the proposed solution is comparable to, and in many cases better than, known alternatives

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207