Calorimetry in nonstandard conditions: The noncrystalline phases of linear polyethylene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A linear Union Carbide PE (UC) has been analyzed by nonstandard calorimetry with a common DSC calorimeter and a Setaram C80 calorimeter. Nonstandard calorimetry entails using a low rate of heating (0.5–1 K/min), a small mass (0.5–1.5 mg), and an open cell (O‐cell) instead of the standard C‐cell. Events in O‐cells overlap less and occur with a faster kinetics than in C‐cells. PE crystals are nascent, solution‐grown (S‐grown), press‐grown (P‐grown), and strained by extrusion. In Part A, the traces show that the phase‐changes in the melt, previously observed in a C80 calorimeter (slow T‐ramp) and characterized by ΔHnetwork, can be observed with a common DSC in nonstandard conditions. In Part B, the difference between the C‐ and O‐cells and the changes in the main peak enthalpy (ΔHortho) are of interest. The main result is that, in O‐cells, the value of ΔHortho around Tortho, exceeds unambiguously in certain conditions ΔHortho found for perfect orthorhombic crystals. The main endotherm contains then another contribution, namely ΔHnetwork. Crystal reorganization during the slow T‐ramp is followed in the C‐ and O‐cells on S‐grown crystals. In O‐cells, lamellar thickening observed in the slow‐ramp is more extensive. The ease of phase‐change depends on the sample history. It is as follows: strained‐part extruded > nascent > S‐grown > P‐grown. Co‐operative chain motions are more hindered in the standard C‐cells than in the O‐cells. In Part C, lower values of m succeed in bringing phase‐changes in P‐grown (O‐cells) samples. The origin of the events is discussed: three processes are thought to contribute to the phase‐changes namely, melting of strained short‐range order, activation of vibrations in the CH2 groups, and fast decay of chain orientation which occurs simultaneously with melting. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 1932–1949, 2007
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".