MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158241074

Prolonged unexplained fatigue in paediatrics

2010· dissertation· en· W2158241074 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. J. Bakker

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQuarter (Canadian coin)ExertionPediatricsMental fatiguePsychiatryPhysical therapyClinical psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prolonged Unexplained Fatigue in Paediatrics. Fatigue, as the result of mental or physical exertion, will disappear after rest, drinks and food. Fatigue as a symptom of illness will recover with the recovering of the illness. But when fatigue is ongoing for a long time, and not the result of exertion or a symptom of an illness, it will become a condition with a serious risk for the educational and social development of children and adolescents. This dissertation presents the results of research in children and adolescents (age 8-18 years), who were referred by their General Practitioner to the Paediatrician. Half of the patients recovered with usual care (i.e. reassurance and advices to visit school and to take part of social activities as much as possible), but the other half the same subjective fatigue severity with the same disabilities one year later and even two years later half of the young patients with CFS was still suffering in the same degree. That means that, notwithstanding all additional kinds of regular and alternative treatments, about one quarter of fatigued youngsters, who visited the paediatrician for the first time developed, a life with serious restrictions, without a medical explanation. These young patients stand for a great challenge to the paediatrician, when they visit him in the early stage of fatigue. The characteristics of the patients repudiate the opinion that ongoing fatigue in young people are related to today’s overloaded life style, late bed times and unhealthy habits. It seems the opposite, the patients participated less in social activities, in spite of good relationships and friendships. We found indications that family dynamics and/or genetic factors increased the vulnerability for fatigue, that life events might be provoking factors and that the social environment was little helpful in resistance. We discovered risk and protective factors for an unfavourable development in the beginning of fatigue. Risk factors were somatic complaints such as blurred vision, hot/ cold spells, constipation, memory deficits, pain in back and extremities, the degree of subjective fatigue measured by the CIS-20, and female gender. Protective was a physically active life style before the onset of fatigue. We found a significant different effect between sport activities in sport clubs and self regulated sports activities. Remarkable was the finding that three patients with the most self regulated sports activities had the worst outcome one year later. The risk and protective factors can be directive for customizing treatment for the individual patient, because the group of fatigued patients is heterogeneous. We explored, on top of the usual care, the usefulness of a video film intervention aiming at the education about the diagnosis CFS and the modelling of coping behaviour. The intervention with that particular film had an adverse effect. Compared with patients who received only usual care, patients who received the film in addition, were equally fatigued but had more school absence and were less motivated one year later. We interpreted the adverse effects as the result of the double message of the film. It is possible that patients particularly picked up the first massage (i.e. fatigue complaints may be the result of a well-known condition: CFS)as an explanation and legitimization of their complaints, but the second message(i.e. how to cope successfully with debilitating fatigue and unhelpful thoughts) did not get across. The conclusion is a serious warning against assigning the label of CFS too early to fatigued children and adolescents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)Same topicFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchFrench-language works237,207