MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158307947 · doi:10.1109/icce.1996.517350

A QUERY INTERFACE FOR MULTIMEDIA DATABASE

2005· article· en· W2158307947 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Consumer Electronics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMultimedia databaseViewQuery languageDatabaseInterface (matter)User interfaceBridge (graph theory)Database schemaInformation retrievalSemantics (computer science)MultimediaGraphicsGraphical user interfaceWorld Wide WebDatabase designProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multimedia database systems involve thousands of hours of video, image, audio, text and graphics that need to be stored, retrieved and manipulated in a large multimedia database. Such a system should provide efficient access to this voluminous information stored in the multimedia database. The fundamental dfficulty in dealing with multimedia data is how to effectively express its veq) rich semantics. The goal of a user interface is to serve as a bridge between the end user and query language and support the query spec$cation process allowing the user to eficiently access the multimedia database system. In this paper, we introduce a graphical user interface on top ofthe query language of multimedia database we proposed in [l]. The user could use visual methods to describe the information she/he would like to retrieve from the database.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it