MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158317896 · doi:10.7202/004627ar

Computational Discourse Analysis for Interpretation

2002· article· fr· W2158317896 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sane Yagi

Bibliographic record

VenueMeta Journal des traducteurs · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and dialogue systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une m"thode informatis"e qui permet lÕexamen attentif du discours dans la langue source et dans la langue cible, milliseconde par milliseconde, a "t" "labor"e afin de permettre une analyse de lÕinterpr"tation. En utilisant un programme sp"cialement d"velopp" ‹ cet effet, lÕanalyse du discours de lÕinterpr"tation peut maintenant 'tre automatis"e et rendue quantitative. Les discours en langue source et en langue cible peuvent 'tre trac"s graphiquement et parall'lement sur lÕaxe des temps, facilitant ainsi la comparaison entre le discours et son interpr"tation simultan"e; on peut comparer la dur"e de chaque "clat et de chaque pause, le d"but et la compensation, le degr" de simultan"it" entre lÕorateur et lÕinterpr'te et bien dÕautres param'tres importants au th"oricien de lÕinterpr"tariat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeta Journal des traducteursSame topicSpeech and dialogue systemsFrench-language works237,207