MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158339149 · doi:10.1109/pecon.2012.6450335

Energy conservation through lighting audit

2012· article· en· W2158339149 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Usman Khalid, Mariam Gul, M.M. Aman, Ahsan Hashmi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy Efficiency and Management
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy conservationElectricityAuditEnergy managementRelocationEnergy consumptionSmart lightingScheduleEnvironmental economicsEfficient energy useLED lampComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringBusinessArchitectural engineeringEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringElectrical engineeringAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lighting constitutes a major portion of electricity consumption in commercial and industrial sector. To some extent, developing countries like Pakistan can meet the energy demand by incorporating energy conservation policy in their Demand Side Management (DSM) program. This paper presents a method to optimize the energy consumption by carrying out lighting audit. The data of Siemens Pakistan department Transformer Business Unit (TBU) is used here as a case study. In the present study, lighting energy demand is controlled by proposing an efficient lighting scheme, using energy efficient lamps, lamps relocation and implementing lighting maintenance schedule. The result shows that around 10.41% of the current energy could be saved by adopting lighting conservation policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficiency and ManagementFrench-language works237,207