MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158339149 · doi:10.1109/pecon.2012.6450335

Energy conservation through lighting audit

2012· article· en· W2158339149 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy Efficiency and Management
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy conservationElectricityAuditEnergy managementRelocationEnergy consumptionSmart lightingScheduleEnvironmental economicsEfficient energy useLED lampComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringBusinessArchitectural engineeringEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringElectrical engineeringAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lighting constitutes a major portion of electricity consumption in commercial and industrial sector. To some extent, developing countries like Pakistan can meet the energy demand by incorporating energy conservation policy in their Demand Side Management (DSM) program. This paper presents a method to optimize the energy consumption by carrying out lighting audit. The data of Siemens Pakistan department Transformer Business Unit (TBU) is used here as a case study. In the present study, lighting energy demand is controlled by proposing an efficient lighting scheme, using energy efficient lamps, lamps relocation and implementing lighting maintenance schedule. The result shows that around 10.41% of the current energy could be saved by adopting lighting conservation policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficiency and ManagementFrench-language works237,207