Concerns of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: results from a clinical population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The impact of chronic illness is influenced not just by physical symptoms but also by psychosocial factors. The aim of this study was to determine the concerns of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in a clinical sample, if concerns differ between patients from varied clinical and demographic variables, and if concerns influence well-being beyond the influence of physical symptoms. METHODS: Subjects (n = 259) completed a validated measure of concerns specific to IBD and provided demographic and disease-related information. RESULTS: The most intense concerns involved both physical (e.g., energy level) and psychosocial issues (e.g., achieving full potential). There were numerous differences in disease concerns based on ability to work but none based on disease duration. Factor analysis yielded three indices: body image and interpersonal concerns, general physical impact, and disease stigma. Age and education only affected certain concern indices in subgroups of patients. Greater concerns negatively influenced well-being beyond the influence of physical symptoms. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial factors, in addition to physical symptoms, play an important role on the impact of illness in patients with IBD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".