MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158375765 · doi:10.1109/iccme.2011.5876798

Signal decomposition by multi-scale PCA and its applications to long-term EEG signal classification

2011· article· en· W2158375765 on OpenAlexafffund
Shengkun Xie, Sridhar Krishnan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsPrincipal component analysisPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceSIGNAL (programming language)Noise (video)WaveletElectroencephalographyScale (ratio)Discrete wavelet transformFeature extractionWavelet transformSignal processingData miningSpeech recognitionImage (mathematics)Digital signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data coming from a real-world complex system are usually contaminated by certain levels of noise or some irrelevant components, which do not contribute to improve signal classification accuracy. Also in signal de-noising, the performance of any statistical method used to recover the original signals may be impacted by the noise. In this paper, we propose the multi-scale principal component analysis (PCA) method, which combines discrete wavelet transform and PCA for de-noising and decomposing complex biomedical signals in both spatial and temporal domains for signal classification. We also develop a new classification method, called Empirical Classification (EC), based on the characteristics of data we analyzed. These methods were applied to a publicly available EEG database for the purpose of epilepsy diagnosis and epileptic seizure detection. Our study shows that signal decomposition by the multi-scale PCA method coupled with the EC method, leads to a highly promising classification accuracy in classifying epileptic EEG signals. Our methods are also applicable for classifying biomedical images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207