MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158399648 · doi:10.1109/aps.1988.94051

Addition theorems for electromagnetic wave scattering by spheroids of arbitrary orientation

2003· article· en· W2158399648 on OpenAlexaff
M.F.R. Cooray, I.R. Ciric

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenfunctionWave functionScalar (mathematics)ScatteringAddition theoremRational functionCoordinate systemPhysicsSpherical coordinate systemTranslation (biology)Prolate spheroidal coordinatesMathematical analysisMathematical physicsPure mathematicsMathematicsClassical mechanicsProlate spheroidGeometryQuantum mechanicsEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rotational-translation addition theorems for two vector spheroidal wave functions are derived from those for the corresponding scalar spheroidal wave functions. These theorems are necessary in obtaining an exact eigenfunction to the problem of scattering of electromagnetic waves by a system of two or more spheroids of arbitrary orientations. A vector spheroidal wave function defined on one spheroidal coordinate system is expressed in terms of a series of vector spheroidal wave functions in another spheroidal coordinate system rotated and translated with respect to the first one. The theorems presented represent an extension of the rational-translational addition theorems for scalar wave functions. Corresponding translational addition theorems for vector spheroidal wave functions of R.H. MacPhie et al. (see Quart. Appl. Math., vol.44, p.737, 1987) result as a special case.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207