Auditeurs en exil : le cas des Chiliens à Montréal et leur rapport à deux chansons emblématiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine l’expérience des auditeurs chiliens exilés à Montréal, se concentrant spécifiquement sur leurs écoutes pendant la dictature militaire (1973-1989). Issus d’une méthodologie mixte qui combine l’histoire orale et l’analyse musicale, les résultats de cette recherche musicologique révèlent la place primordiale que l’audition musicale eut chez les exilés dans la reconstruction d’un lien avec leur pays d’origine, ainsi que dans le développement du mouvement de solidarité avec le peuple chilien. L’article explique, d’abord, le déploiement des goûts musicaux et identifie les répertoires canoniques qui demeurent au centre des écoutes. Ensuite, il aborde le rôle de l’usage des enregistrements en vinyle et cassette, et de la radio dans la diffusion des musiques. Enfin, les deux dernières sections explorent les significations associées aux pièces musicales ‘Gracias a la Vida’ et ‘Vuelvo’, mettant en relief la complexité de la réception en ce qui concerne la construction des identités culturelles, le récit des histoires personnelles et communautaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".