MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158425448 · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2012.10.019

Inhibitory effect of soy protein coating formulations on walnut (Juglans regia L.) kernels against lipid oxidation

2012· article· en· W2158425448 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLWT · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsJuglansChemistryFood scienceJuglandaceaeSoy proteinBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to improve the fat stability in walnut ( Juglans regia L.) kernels using an edible coating treatment. Coating solutions were composed of soy protein isolate (SPI), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and catechin (CT). Walnuts were dipped in coating solution, dried and stored under abuse temperature condition (35 °C) for 21 days. Lipid oxidation was evaluated by peroxide and thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) measurements. Results showed a slight decrease in peroxide values (POV) and a significant reduction of TBARS by coating treatment. The SPI–CT and SPI/CMC–CT coatings were the most effective and decreased the POV by 27 and 31%, respectively, as compared to uncoated walnut after 21 days. The SPI–CT and SPI/CMC–CT coatings also decreased the TBARS value by 16 and 26%, respectively. The incorporation of CT in SPI-based coatings resulted in a synergistic effect on the lipid oxidation preservation. The results of this study show that soy protein-based coating could be a good carrier for antioxidant molecules, and an effective preservative method for extending shelf life and improving the quality stability of oxidation-sensitive kernels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it