MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158453570 · doi:10.5430/jst.v3n4p22

The role of disparity-mutagenesis model on tumor development with special reference to increased mutation rate

2013· article· en· W2158453570 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mitsuru Furusawa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Solid Tumors · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMutation rateMutationMutagenesisCarcinogenesisBiologyMutation AccumulationGeneticsCancerCancer researchGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human solid tumors are believed to have very high mutation rates at least in the early stage of extension. Irrespective ofwhether the increased mutation rate is a necessary condition for the tumor development or not, extremely high mutationrates such as in excess of the so-called “threshold” would before long result in the natural death of tumor cells. In reality,however, we are dying by cancer. Thus, it has been hypothesized that tumor cells should make a quick transition from thehigher mutation state to the lower one. According to our “disparity-mutagenesis model”, however, carcinogenesis couldcontinue without any incident even under a prolonged period of high mutation rates. Namely, if lagging-strand-biasedmutations far beyond the threshold of mutation rate are introduced in tumor cells, the tumor could progress to malignantextension without extinction. The results of evolution experiments using mutator microorganisms are discussed in terms ofcarcinogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Solid TumorsSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207