An Internally Located RNA Hairpin Enhances Replication of <i>Tomato Bushy Stunt Virus</i> RNAs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Defective interfering (DI) RNAs of Tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSV), a plus-sense RNA virus, comprise four conserved noncontiguous regions (I through IV) derived from the viral genome. Region III, a 70-nucleotide-long sequence corresponding to a genomic segment located 378 nucleotides upstream of the 3' terminus of the genome, has been found to enhance DI RNA accumulation by approximately 10-fold in an orientation-independent manner (D. Ray and K. A. White, Virology 256:162-171, 1999). In this study, a more detailed structure-function analysis of region III was conducted. RNA secondary-structure analyses indicated that region III contains stem-loop structures in both plus and minus strands. Through deletion analyses of a DI RNA, a primary determinant of region III activity was mapped to the 5'-proximal 35-nucleotide segment. Compensatory-type mutational analyses showed that a stem-loop structure in the minus strand of this subregion was required for enhanced DI RNA replication. The same stem-loop structure was also found to function in a position-independent manner in a DI RNA (albeit at reduced levels) and to be important for efficient accumulation within the context of the TBSV genome. Taken together, these observations suggest that the 5'-proximal segment of region III is a modular RNA replication element that functions primarily through the formation of an RNA hairpin structure in the minus strand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".