Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of CPX-1 Liposome Injection in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: CPX-1 is a novel, liposome-encapsulated formulation of irinotecan and floxuridine designed to prolong in vitro optimized synergistic molar ratios of both drugs postinfusion. This open-label, single-arm, dose-escalating phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of CPX-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received CPX-1 at 30, 60, 100, 150, 210, or 270 units/m(2) (1 unit = 1 mg irinotecan + 0.36 mg floxuridine) infused over 90 minutes every 14 days in 28-day cycles. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled, treated, and evaluated for safety; 30 patients were evaluated for response. A 1:1 plasma irinotecan to floxuridine molar ratio was maintained for 8 to 12 hours. Grade 3/4 toxicities included diarrhea (24.2%), neutropenia (12.1%), and hypokalemia (12.1%); 1 patient (270 units/m(2)) died of persistent diarrhea, which led to dehydration and renal failure (grade 5). Partial response occurred in 3 (12%) of the 25 subjects evaluated through Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Progression-free survival lasting >6 months occurred in 9 patients, 6 with colorectal cancer. Among 15 colorectal cancer patients (10 with prior irinotecan), the calculated median progression-free survival was 5.4 months; 11 patients (72.7%) achieved disease control and 2 patients (13%) had partial response. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient CPX-1 was well tolerated and antitumor activity was shown in patients with advanced solid tumors. The recommended dose for future studies is 210 units/m(2). This is the first clinical evaluation of fixed drug ratio dosing designed to maintain synergistic molar ratios for enhanced therapeutic benefit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".