MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158487111 · doi:10.1080/03632415.2014.915811

Canadian Recreational Fisheries: 35 Years of Social, Biological, and Economic Dynamics from a National Survey

2014· article· en· W2158487111 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacob W. Brownscombe, Shannon D. Bower, William B. Bowden, Liane B. Nowell, Jonathan D. Midwood, Neville Johnson, Steven J. Cooke

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecreationRecreational fishingFishingFisheryGeographyFish <Actinopterygii>Survey data collectionScale (ratio)Fisheries scienceCatch and releaseFisheries managementEcologyBiologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Fisheries and Oceans Canada has collected a unique, long-term data set on the social, biological, and economic dynamics of Canada's recreational fisheries. Starting in 1975, these data were collected through mail surveys to recreational anglers at 5-year intervals. A longitudinal analysis revealed that there was an average of 4.5 million licensed anglers catching an annual average of 255 million fish. Release rates were relatively high (53% of fish released on average), with recent survey data (2010) suggesting that release rates had exceeded 60%. Recreational anglers also contribute an average of $8.8 billion each year to the Canadian economy. However, recreational angling has become less popular over time, and the average age of participants has increased. The data were also useful for characterizing Canada's fisheries, including species-specific catch and harvest. Canada is one of the few countries to collect such extensive recreational fisheries data at a national scale and to do so at regular intervals, an approach that could be modeled by other countries. RESUMEN la agencia de Pesquerías y Océanos de Canadá ha recolectado una base de datos históricos de la dinámica social, biológica y ecológica de las pesquerías recreativas de Canadá. Esta información, que comienza en 1975, fue compilada a través de sondeos por correo postal, realizados a intervalos de cinco años, dirigidos a pescadores. Un análisis longitudinal reveló que existen en promedio 4.5 millones de pescadores con licencia, que capturan una media de 255 millones de peces. Las tasas de liberación fueron relativamente altas (53% de peces liberados) y los datos del sondeo más reciente (2010) indican que la tasa de liberación excede el 60%. Asimismo, los pescadores recreativos contribuyen, en promedio, con $8.8 mil millones anuales a la economía canadiense. Sin embargo, con el tiempo, la pesca recreativa se ha vuelto cada vez menos popular y el promedio de la edad de los participantes se ha incrementado. Los datos también fueron útiles para caracterizar las pesquerías de Canadá, incluyendo captura y cosecha por especie. Canadá es uno de los pocos países que recolectan datos de pesca recreativa de forma tan extensiva a nivel nacional y lo hace en intervalos regulares, algo que pudiera ser imitado por otros países.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.014
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations111
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFisheriesSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207