Design and Optimization of a Novel Bored Biplanar Permanent-Magnet Assembly for Hybrid Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a novel design for a biplanar permanent-magnet assembly suitable for use in hybrid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems. The key feature of our design is a large cylindrical hole that is longitudinally bored through the entire magnet assembly. The presence of the bore permits the potential inclusion of additional peripheral devices within or near the magnet structure that may benefit from being placed along, or oriented parallel to, the main magnetic field. In particular, the magnet assembly can be considered for use in an integrated system consisting of a 6 MV medical linear accelerator (linac) coupled to an MRI system for state-of-the-art real-time image-guided adaptive radiotherapy. We use magnetic field calculations based on the finite-element method (FEM) to quantify the detrimental effects of the bore on the field homogeneity in the imaging volume for pole-piece designs found commonly in industry. We then demonstrate that shape optimization of the pole pieces yields novel pole designs that lead to suitable levels of field homogeneity. We examined the resultant magnetic field within the bore for the optimized design and found that it has maximum field homogeneity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".