Optimal discretizations in adaptive finite element electromagnetics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract One of the primary objectives of adaptive finite element analysis research is to determine how to effectively discretize a problem in order to obtain a sufficiently accurate solution efficiently. Therefore, the characterization of optimal finite element solution properties could have significant implications on the development of improved adaptive solver technologies. Ultimately, the analysis of optimally discretized systems, in order to learn about ideal solution characteristics, can lead to the design of better feedback refinement criteria for guiding practical adaptive solvers towards optimal solutions efficiently and reliably. A theoretical framework for the qualitative and numerical study of optimal finite element solutions to differential equations of macroscopic electromagnetics is presented in this study for one‐, two‐ and three‐dimensional systems. The formulation is based on variational aspects of optimal discretizations for Helmholtz systems that are closely related to the underlying stationarity principle used in computing finite element solutions to continuum problems. In addition, the theory is adequately general and appropriate for the study of a range of electromagnetics problems including static and time‐harmonic phenomena. Moreover, finite element discretizations with arbitrary distributions of element sizes and degrees of approximating functions are assumed, so that the implications of the theory for practical h ‐, p ‐, hp ‐ and r ‐type finite element adaption in multidimensional analyses may be examined. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it