Optimal Threshold Policies for Hard-Kill of Enemy Radars With High Speed Anti-Radiation Missiles (HARMS)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In modern network centric warfare (NCW) there is a dedicated platform (airplane) assigned to every group of aircraft that specializes in the hard-kill of the enemy guidance-radars by deploying high speed anti-radiation missiles (HARM)s. In this paper we consider the problem of optimal launch control of the HARMs. We formulate the optimal trade-off between the cost of the HARMs and the latency in performing the hard-kill of the enemy radar as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP). Next, by reformulating this POMDP as a Markovian search problem, we prove that optimal missile launch control policies are threshold-based policies in nature. We then present optimal threshold policies that unlike their POMDP counterparts are computationally efficient and inexpensive to implement in real time combat systems. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of these threshold based missile deployment algorithms
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it