MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158542348

FKBP12.6 mice display temporal gender differences in cardiac Ca2+-signalling phenotype upon chronic pressure overload

2011· article· en· W2158542348 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
PrévilonMiresta, PezetMylène, SemprezFannie, MercadierJean-Jacques, Rouet-BenzinebPatricia

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSignaling Pathways in Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNFATCalcineurinPressure overloadRyanodine receptor 2Internal medicineRyanodine receptorEndocrinologyFKBPMuscle hypertrophyHeart failureHypertrophic cardiomyopathyLeft ventricular hypertrophyMedicineReceptorChemistryBiologyCell biologyBlood pressureTransplantationCardiac hypertrophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preventing Ca2+-leak during diastole may provide a means to improve overall cardiac function. The immunosuppressant FK506-binding protein 12.6 (FKBP12.6) regulates ryanodine receptor-2 (RyR2) gating and binds to and inhibits calcineurin (Cn). It is also involved in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF). Here, we investigated the effects of FKBP12.6 over-expression and gender on Ca2+-handling proteins (RyR2, SERCA2a/PLB, and NCX), and on pro-(CaMKII, Cn/NFAT) and anti-hypertrophic (GSK3β) signalling pathways in a thoracic aortic constriction (TAC) mouse model. Wild type mice (WT) and mice over-expressing FKBP12.6 of both genders underwent TAC or sham-operation (Sham). FKBP12.6 over-expression ameliorated post-TAC survival rates in both genders. Over time, FKBP12.6 over-expression reduced the molecular signature of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and the transition to HF (BNP and β-MHC mRNAs) and attenuated Cn/NFAT activation in TAC-males only. The gender difference in pro- and anti-hypertrophic LVH ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicSignaling Pathways in DiseaseFrench-language works237,207