MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158561068 · doi:10.1109/glocom.1995.502737

Accurate modeling of H.261 VBR video sources for packet transmission studies

2002· article· en· W2158561068 on OpenAlexaff
C.M. Sharon, Ioannis Lambadaris, Michael Devetsikiotis, A.R. Kaye

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVariable bitrateCodecQuantization (signal processing)AutocorrelationReal-time computingNetwork packetTransmission (telecommunications)AlgorithmFrame (networking)Packet switchingBit rateComputer networkTelecommunicationsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the segmentation of variable bit rate video information produced by an H.261 codec, modified for variable bit-rate output, for transmission over packet-switched and Frame Relay networks. It is shown that packetizing at the Group of Blocks level is required to match the characteristics of such networks and that this requires a more sophisticated statistical model of the resulting data stream than the frame-level models that are frequently used. A Transform Expand Sample (TES) technique is used to obtain an accurate model of the autocorrelation and the marginal probability distribution of the bit-rate variations at this level. Furthermore, a new, simplified but accurate, method is introduced for dealing with the periodic components that are present in the autocorrelation when modeled at this level. The model is extended to permit simulations of systems in which the codec quantization rate can be controlled by network congestion notifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207