MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158566795 · doi:10.1109/icecs.2009.5410863

A low-area power-efficient CMOS active rectifier for wirelessly powered medical devices

2009· article· en· W2158566795 on OpenAlexafffund
Saeid Hashemi, Mohamad Sawan, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsRectifier (neural networks)CMOSSchematicTransconductanceCapacitorElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringTransistorVoltageEngineeringComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present in this paper a new full-wave active rectifier topology. It uses a single bootstrapped capacitor to reduce the effective threshold voltage of selected MOS switches in both positive and negative input source cycles. It achieves a significant saving in silicon area while having a remarkably high power efficiency and low voltage drop. The structure does not require complex circuit design. A simple direct control scheme is used to connect the bootstrapped reservoir to the main pass switches at proper time. The highest voltages available in the circuit are used to drive the gates of selected transistors in order to reduce the leakages and to lower their channel on-resistance, while having high transconductance. The new design benefits from low-threshold MOS available in advanced CMOS technologies. The proposed rectifier was implemented using the standard TSMC 0.18 ¿m CMOS process and then characterized with the SpectreS simulator. The circuit was laid out and reported post-layout simulation results were found in good agreement with schematics-based simulations. The design saves almost 70% area compared to a previously reported double capacitor structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207