MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158609113 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2007.54

A Power Control Scheme for Directional MAC Protocols in MANET

2007· article· en· W2158609113 on OpenAlexaff
B. Alawieh, Chadi Assi, Wessam Ajib

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDirectional antennaThroughputComputer networkTransmission (telecommunications)Mobile ad hoc networkPower controlDirectivityWireless ad hoc networkPower (physics)WirelessElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringNetwork packetAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Higher throughput gains and prolonged life time can be achieved for mobile ad hoc networks (MANET) with nodes equipped with directional antennas. The employment of directional antennas can enhance the spatial reuse by allowing concurrent communications to occur within the same vicinity. Another advantage of directional antennas is the higher gain resulted from its directivity, which can be utilized to reduce the transmission power during a directional transmission. In order to maximize the throughput and energy gains from directional antennas, we propose in this paper a transmission power control scheme for directional medium access protocol (MAC) protocols. The proposed scheme can be integrated to any directional MAC protocol that adopts a single channel for transmission and reception of IEEE 802.11 frames. The proposed power control scheme exploits the temporal directional transmission power correlations that exist between the IEEE 802.11 frames (RTS/CTS/DATA/ACK) for successful communication. Simulation results for different topologies are used to demonstrate the significant throughput and energy gains that can be obtained under the investigated scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207