MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158628801 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2004.823584

Optimization of Linear Iterative Interference-Cancellation Receivers for CDMA Communications

2004· article· en· W2158628801 on OpenAlexaff
N. Albeanu, Teng Joon Lim

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle antenna interference cancellationEigendecomposition of a matrixIterative methodDecorrelationConvergence (economics)Interference (communication)Code division multiple accessMultiuser detectionEigenvalues and eigenvectorsComputer scienceSpread spectrumAlgorithmMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Mathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iterative methods to solve a linear equation system can be used to derive multistage interference cancellers (ICs) that converge to the decorrelating or the minimum mean-square error linear detectors. The link between linear multistage IC and iterative solution methods is well known; however, the parameters needed for fastest convergence are functions of the eigenvalues of the channel matrix. In this letter, we propose new methods for finding optimal parameters without eigendecomposition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0060.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207