MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158631304 · doi:10.1136/thx.2007.077370

Recommendations for the assessment and management of cough in children

2007· article· en· W2158631304 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michael D. Shields, Andrew Bush, Mark L. Everard, S A McKenzie, R A Primhak

Bibliographic record

VenueThorax · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory and Cough-Related Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Step 1 MDS performed a database literature search (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar) initially using the terms ''cough'' AND ''child''. Exclusions included non-English language papers and papers on pertussis vaccine development. Also excluded were papers on specific diseases including asthma, cystic fibrosis and pneumonia for which management guidelines have already been published. Abstracts of papers were then reviewed and relevant papers obtained. The relevant studies to the UK population were largely performed in Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0090.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0100.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations277
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThoraxSame topicRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchFrench-language works237,207