Discriminative Density Propagation for 3D Human Motion Estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a mixture density propagation algorithm to estimate 3D human motion in monocular video sequences based on observations encoding the appearance of image silhouettes. Our approach is discriminative rather than generative, therefore it does not require the probabilistic inversion of a predictive observation model. Instead, it uses a large human motion capture data-base and a 3D computer graphics human model in order to synthesize training pairs of typical human configurations together with their realistically rendered 2D silhouettes. These are used to directly learn to predict the conditional state distributions required for 3D body pose tracking and thus avoid using the generative 3D model for inference (the learned discriminative predictors can also be used, complementary, as importance samplers in order to improve mixing or initialize generative inference algorithms). We aim for probabilistically motivated tracking algorithms and for models that can represent complex multivalued mappings common in inverse, uncertain perception inferences. Our paper has three contributions: (1) we establish the density propagation rules for discriminative inference in continuous, temporal chain models; (2) we propose flexible algorithms for learning multimodal state distributions based on compact, conditional Bayesian mixture of experts models; and (3) we demonstrate the algorithms empirically on real and motion capture-based test sequences and compare against nearest-neighbor and regression methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".