MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158685876 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2005.1578267

Delay limited optimal and suboptimal power and bit loading algorithms for OFDM systems over correlated fading channels

2005· article· en· W2158685876 on OpenAlexaff
Jahangir Hossain, D.V. Djonin, V.K. Bhargava

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingFadingMarkov decision processComputer scienceAlgorithmDynamic programmingTransmitter power outputMathematical optimizationTransmission (telecommunications)Power (physics)Markov processMathematicsTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)TransmitterDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores optimal and suboptimal power and bit loading algorithms for a multicarrier system. Specifically, we study the trade-offs between the total transmit power of an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) system and the buffering delay of the packets in a transmission buffer. The loading framework is formulated as a Markov decision process (MDP) and an optimal loading policy which minimizes the transmit power while meeting a target delay constraint is obtained via equivalent linear programming (LP) methodology. The complexity of finding the optimal loading policy and its' implementation issues are described. Since finding the optimal policies becomes complex and practically un-realizable for large number of carriers in the system, we offer a sub-optimal power and bit loading algorithm using the results of the single carrier system's power and rate adaptation policy and a greedy approach. Selected numerical examples show that the sub-optimal algorithm, which has reduced complexity, has performance close to the optimal one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005.Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207