MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158688880 · doi:10.1109/ict.2005.1519948

Exploratory synthesis of new heavy main group chalcogenides

2005· article· en· W2158688880 on OpenAlexaff
Abdeljalil Assoud, Shahab Derakhshan, Navid Soheilnia, Holger Kleinke

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyThermoelectric effectTinSeebeck coefficientBand gapMaterials scienceX-ray crystallographyPhysicsChemistryDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have recently commenced to investigate mixed valent tin chalcogenides as well as polychalcogenides, namely SrSn/sub 2/Se/sub 4/, Sr/sub 2/SnSe/sub 5/, Ba/sub 2/SnSe/sub 5/, and Ba/sub 2/SnTe/sub 5/. These materials exhibit (calculated and in part experimentally confirmed) band gaps between 0.2 eV (Ba/sub 2/SnTe/sub 5/) and 1.2 eV (Ba/sub 2/SnSe/sub 5/). Molecular units are predominant in these materials, namely SnSe/sub 4//sup 4-/ tetrahedra, Sn/sub 3/Se/sub 10//sup 8-/ and Sn/sub 3/Te/sub 10//sup 8u/ilding blocks, respectively, as well as Se/sub 3//sup 2-/ and Te/sub 5//sup 4-/ units. Three-dimensionally interconnected covalent networks were found in the new quaternaries Ba/sub 3/Cu/sub 2/Sn/sub 3/Se/sub 10/, BaCu/sub 2/SnSe/sub 4/, and BaAg/sub 2/SnSe/sub 4/, including the Ba/sup 2+/ cations in one-dimensional channels. Despite the small band gaps (e.g., 0.2 eV for BaAg/sub 2/SnSe/sub 4/), the as-prepared samples exhibit rather small electrical conductivities, but large Seebeck coefficients (above +500 /spl mu/V/K at 300 K). Our most recently discovered polytellurides Ba/sub 3/Cu/sub 14-/spl delta//Te/sub 12/ and Ba/sub 2/Cu/sub 4-/spl delta//Te/sub 5/ comprising extended Cu atom substructures appear to have thermoelectric properties superior to the tin chalcogenides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207