MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158711697 · doi:10.1345/aph.19157

The Role of the Pharmacist in Humanitarian Aid in Bosnia-Herzegovina: The Experience of Pharmaciens Sans Frontières

2000· article· en· W2158711697 on OpenAlex
Jean‐François Bussières, Chantal St-Arnaud, Christine Schunck, Diane Lamarre, François Jouberton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Pharmacotherapy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint HyacintheCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacistMedicinePharmacyMedical emergencyNursingDistribution (mathematics)Health carePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Founded in 1985, Pharmaciens Sans Frontières (PSF) is a nongovemmental organization of pharmacists involved in humanitarian aid. PSF relied on approximately 100 expatriates in 1998, which included 50 pharmacists distributed throughout 24 missions (i.e., 14 emergency, 7 development, 3 assessment). It is necessary to add 200-250 local staff to this group. OBJECTIVE: To describe PSF's mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina from 1992 to 1999 and to define the pharmacist's impact in the supply of medicines and the development of pharmaceutical care and services. RESULTS: In April 1992, at the beginning of Sarajevo's siege, PSF sent a small team of three volunteer pharmacists to Bosnia-Herzegovina. The objective of the emergency phase (1992-1995) was to set up a massive supply program of essential medicines and medical and biologic materials and to implement a distribution system based on existing health centers. The signing of the Dayton peace agreement and a progressive return to peace and stability marked the beginning of the postemergency phase (1995-1997). This phase pursued previous objectives of establishing a distribution network and added the implementation of logistic centers. PSF widened its involvement to medical laboratory analysis, production of medicines, disposal of expired medications sent during the conflict, and the implementation of a national center for quality control. Currently, the development phase's (1998-1999) objective is to provide adequate support for the reorganization of pharmaceutical care and services by establishing pharmacy work groups and developing and maintaining good relationships with the international community and Bosnia-Herzegovina pharmacists. CONCLUSIONS: Humanitarian aid is essential in major conflicts, as seen in the case of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Although it is difficult to evaluate the impact of the distribution network implemented by PSF, it allowed for a better provisioning of medications to the general population. PSF played an important role in such cases. In fact, PSF provides its pharmaceutical expertise to these embattled areas not only by offering financial support to the logistics or supplying of medications, but by offering professional support to the organization/reorganization of the pharmaceutical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it