The Role of the Pharmacist in Humanitarian Aid in Bosnia-Herzegovina: The Experience of Pharmaciens Sans Frontières
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Founded in 1985, Pharmaciens Sans Frontières (PSF) is a nongovemmental organization of pharmacists involved in humanitarian aid. PSF relied on approximately 100 expatriates in 1998, which included 50 pharmacists distributed throughout 24 missions (i.e., 14 emergency, 7 development, 3 assessment). It is necessary to add 200-250 local staff to this group. OBJECTIVE: To describe PSF's mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina from 1992 to 1999 and to define the pharmacist's impact in the supply of medicines and the development of pharmaceutical care and services. RESULTS: In April 1992, at the beginning of Sarajevo's siege, PSF sent a small team of three volunteer pharmacists to Bosnia-Herzegovina. The objective of the emergency phase (1992-1995) was to set up a massive supply program of essential medicines and medical and biologic materials and to implement a distribution system based on existing health centers. The signing of the Dayton peace agreement and a progressive return to peace and stability marked the beginning of the postemergency phase (1995-1997). This phase pursued previous objectives of establishing a distribution network and added the implementation of logistic centers. PSF widened its involvement to medical laboratory analysis, production of medicines, disposal of expired medications sent during the conflict, and the implementation of a national center for quality control. Currently, the development phase's (1998-1999) objective is to provide adequate support for the reorganization of pharmaceutical care and services by establishing pharmacy work groups and developing and maintaining good relationships with the international community and Bosnia-Herzegovina pharmacists. CONCLUSIONS: Humanitarian aid is essential in major conflicts, as seen in the case of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Although it is difficult to evaluate the impact of the distribution network implemented by PSF, it allowed for a better provisioning of medications to the general population. PSF played an important role in such cases. In fact, PSF provides its pharmaceutical expertise to these embattled areas not only by offering financial support to the logistics or supplying of medications, but by offering professional support to the organization/reorganization of the pharmaceutical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".