MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158743954 · doi:10.1044/2015_aja-15-0003

Communication Development in Early-Identified Children With Mild Bilateral and Unilateral Hearing Loss

2015· article· en· W2158743954 on OpenAlex
Elizabeth M. Fitzpatrick, Andrée Durieux-Smith, Isabelle Gaboury, Doug Coyle, JoAnne Whittingham

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Audiology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHearing Impairment and Communication
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de SherbrookeChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAudiologyHearing lossLanguage developmentMedicineUnilateral hearing lossCochlear implantationLongitudinal studyAffect (linguistics)PsychologyDevelopmental psychologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: This clinical focus article provides preliminary findings from a multicenter longitudinal study investigating auditory and communication development in children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss of any degree. METHOD: A total of 100 children (55 with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss and 45 with normal hearing) underwent 1 or more assessments from a battery of auditory and language measures. RESULTS: Children up to age 4 years demonstrated auditory and language skills similar to those of children with normal hearing. CONCLUSIONS: Factors that affect outcomes in communication development will be explored as additional data are collected in this ongoing study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it