MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158849941 · doi:10.1139/o06-069

From transcription to transport: emerging roles for nuclear myosin IThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 27th International West Coast Chromatin and Chromosome Conference, and has undergone the Journal's usual peer review process.

2006· review· en· W2158849941 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wilma A. Hofmann, Terezina Johnson, Marcin Klapczynski, Ji-Lao Fan, Primal de Lanerolle

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRNA polymerase IIMyosinChromatinBiologyTranscription (linguistics)Cell biologyMolecular motorTranscription factoriesActinTranscription factorGeneticsGeneTranscriptional regulationGene expressionPromoter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myosins are a superfamily of actin-activated ATPases that, in the cytoplasm, work together with actin as molecular motors. The presence of actin in the nucleus has been known for many years. The demonstration of a nuclear isoform of a myosin, nuclear myosin I (NMI), stimulated a great deal of interest in possible intranuclear motor functions of an acto-NMI complex. NMI has been shown to be involved in transcription by RNA polymerases I and II. In both cases, NMI interacts with the respective polymerase and is critically involved in the basic process of transcription. A recent study on intranuclear long-range chromosome movement has now demonstrated a role for NMI in the translocation of chromosome regions as well. Moreover, this movement is based on an active and directed process that is facilitated by an acto-NMI complex, establishing for the first time a functional role for a motor complex consisting of actin and a myosin in the nucleus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207