MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158866396 · doi:10.37236/840

Subsums of a Zero-sum Free Subset of an Abelian Group

2008· article· en· W2158866396 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Electronic Journal of Combinatorics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaBrock UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsAbelian groupZero (linguistics)Multiplicity (mathematics)Group (periodic table)Free abelian groupCyclic groupSequence (biology)Discrete mathematicsFree groupElementary abelian groupRank of an abelian group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $G$ be an additive finite abelian group and $S \subset G$ a subset. Let f$(S)$ denote the number of nonzero group elements which can be expressed as a sum of a nonempty subset of $S$. It is proved that if $|S|=6$ and there are no subsets of $S$ with sum zero, then f$(S)\geq 19$. Obviously, this lower bound is best possible, and thus this result gives a positive answer to an open problem proposed by R.B. Eggleton and P. Erdős in 1972. As a consequence, we prove that any zero-sum free sequence $S$ over a cyclic group $G$ of length $|S| \ge {6|G|+28\over19}$ contains some element with multiplicity at least ${6|S|-|G|+1\over17}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it