MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158869043 · doi:10.2514/1.29438

Linearized Dynamics of Formation Flying Spacecraft on a J2-Perturbed Elliptical Orbit

2007· article· en· W2158869043 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpacecraftElliptic orbitOrbit (dynamics)PhysicsAerospace engineeringOrbital mechanicsOrbit determinationClassical mechanicsControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceAstronomySatelliteEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A linearized set of equations of relative motion about a J 2 -perturbed elliptical reference orbit is developed. This model uses analytical relations that are well suited for onboard applications. The inclusion of the J 2 perturbation in a simple analytical model can lead to formation flying guidance and control algorithms that make use of the natural J 2 -induced relative motion to perform maneuvers instead of constantly compensating for this perturbation. The model uses the linearized differential drift rate of mean orbit elements to predict the impact of the J 2 perturbation on relative osculating spacecraft motion. It analytically provides the relative motion in Hill coordinates at any given true anomaly using only the initial osculating relative orbit elements and the initial orbit elements of the reference trajectory. A linear time-varying state-space form of the model is also presented. Simulation results show that relative motion prediction remains accurate over several orbits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it