Performance evaluation of haptic data compression methods in teleoperation systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present the performance evaluation of haptic compression methods for networked teleoperation systems or haptic interfaces in virtual environments. Haptic data, which include position, velocity, and force data exchanged through the communication channel, are considered by various compression methods based on down-sampling. We introduce the operational rate-distortion performance measure that evaluates not only the compression ratio, but also the quality of reconstructed haptic data. The deadband method, also known as a perception-based haptic compression method, is categorized as an adaptive down-sampling method and compared with a fixed rate down-sampling method. In the case of force data compression, we propose the modified deadband method, which adopts a force predictor, a quantizer, and a contact force detector. Experiments are performed by using a haptic device incorporated with a virtual teleoperator. The performance evaluation and comparison of the fixed rate down-sampling, deadband, prediction-based deadband, and modified deadband methods are provided. The results show that the proposed method achieves improvement in the compression ratio and quality measurement compared to other methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".