L'émergence d'une migration féminine autonome du milieu rural vers le milieu urbain au Burkina FASO ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, nous utilisons les données de l’enquête nationale "Dynamique migratoire, insertion urbaine et environnement au Burkina Faso – 2000" pour vérifier l'hypothèse de l'émergence d'une migration féminine autonome du milieu rural vers le milieu urbain au Burkina Faso. La migration "autonome" est définie comme une migration visant à satisfaire des objectifs économiques individuels. Nous montrons que la migration autonome n’explique que partiellement la recrudescence des migrations de femmes célibataires du milieu rural vers le milieu urbain. Les migrations de femmes mariées, qui restent prépondérantes entre le milieu rural et le milieu urbain au Burkina Faso, répondent essentiellement, quant à elles, à des impératifs familiaux. Cependant, on observe que le mariage avec un migrant peut, dans certains cas, répondre à des objectifs économiques individuels. Finalement, les changements relevés apparaissent assez subtiles et s’inscrivent plutôt dans la continuité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".