MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158905458

Minimal realization and L 2 -sensitivity analysis for 3-D separable-denominator digital filters

2010· article· en· W2158905458 on OpenAlexaff
Takao Hinamoto, Akimitsu Doi, Wu-Sheng Lu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeparable spaceTransfer functionDigital filterMathematicsRealization (probability)Sensitivity (control systems)Minimal realizationNorm (philosophy)Connection (principal bundle)CascadeFilter (signal processing)State spaceFunction (biology)Mathematical analysisApplied mathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceCombinatoricsLinear systemGeometryEngineeringStatisticsElectronic engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problems of minimal state-space realization for a three-dimensional (3-D) separable-denominator digital filter and analysis of l 2 -sensitivity for the realized 3-D state-space model are investigated. First, a 3-D transfer function with separable denominator is expressed as a cascade connection of three one-dimensional (1-D) transfer functions by applying a minimal decomposition technique. Next, each 1-D transfer function is realized by a state-space model of minimal order. The l 2 -sensitivity of a 3-D separable-denominator transfer function with respect to the state-space paramters is then analyzed based on a pure l 2 norm. Finally, a numerical example is presented to evaluate the l 2 -sensitivity of a 3-D state-space model realized from a given 3-D separable-denominator digital filter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207