“A Man's Gotta Do What a Man's Gotta Do,” and Other Memorable Lines from “Philosophy and Film”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For ten years now at Florida State University I have been teaching a course called “Philosophy and Film” for the Honors Program. To give you some background I should say that I am an English-born philosopher who has been teaching now for nearly fifty years. For the first thirty-five years I taught at a medium-sized university in Ontario, Canada (a public university, as are nearly all universities in Canada), and for the last twelve years at Florida State University. I left Canada at the age of sixty to avoid compulsory retirement, but looked upon coming South as an opportunity and not simply an escape. Most of my labors on this new campus have been directed toward starting a small graduate program in the history and philosophy of science, but I have always done (and enjoyed) a lot of undergraduate teaching.When I found that there was an honors program on campus that was looking for instructors, I jumped at the chance. The opportunity was attractive for a number of reasons. Most obviously, one would be teaching bright, motivated students, and in small groups (around fifteen, although this number has increased slightly recently). What really appealed to me, however, was something that, for many faculty, actually made unattractive the prospect of teaching in the honors program. One is encouraged to do something—to offer a course—that is somewhat outside the loop. My professional field is the philosophy of science, and what was very much not needed was another course in the philosophy of science. What was needed rather was something that, well, would be right for an honors program! I take this to mean something to do with culture in a broad sense—meaning that it could as easily be something to do with the sciences as the humanities, but should be about issues in society and more generally relating to the intellectual and social milieu in which we are raised and live.I am not quite sure where I got the idea of a philosophy and film course. One sense that I have is that around 2000, a number of philosophers were independently starting to think in terms of philosophy courses based on the movies. My completely unscientific evidence for this is that, checking with Amazon.com, I find that there are around ten or more texts on the topic published in the past five years or so. That would suggest that ideas were gestating about ten years ago. I do remember that the distinguished philosopher Stanley Cavell (he was for many years at Harvard, teaching aesthetics) had written on film, particularly on Hollywood comedies from the thirties and forties. He might have had an influence on me, although I am not sure that I ever read anything that he had written and probably picked things up from such places as the New York Review of Books. (Don't we all?!)One thing that leads me to suspect that there was an influence was that Cavell did not choose “important” or “distinguished” movies, but rather movies that people like—more importantly, movies that he liked. That attitude has been absolutely basic for me in my approach to my course. I look upon movies in the twentieth century as akin to opera in the nineteenth century. A great art form has first and foremost to be entertaining, has to be fun. I don't think twentieth-century art has been much fun, and twentieth-century music has certainly not been. But the movies have been, and that for me is the starting point. (Incidentally, by “movies” I mean movies and not television. For me, television never has had that almost mystical sense of wonder and enjoyment as the lights go down and the screen takes over. This is not to say you couldn't have a course on television and philosophy—it is just that I don't think it would be the same course.)So what about my course? I set it up ten years ago and haven't done a lot of tampering with it since. We meet once a week for three hours. A designated student gives a five-minute introduction to the week's movie (date, director, and so forth), and then we watch the movie together. After a short break—at seventy-one that is not a luxury for me!—we discuss the movie for about forty-five minutes. Not much less but also not much more. are to to I don't take but I people are not there and and this is not a all almost all of the I remember about years the a of the I to meet once a a me a had had to for was I so much of the the the watch it on so that the could be for and and so A of years he to me and been to or three who had the course and had been so what was (and for me absolutely We have a it is just then we about it as a on the a a week or more in just to be the same I think it is the that I have very and I there is a that has to do with the should that we do it this to watch the would be the one of that you that there is a at some the the and in an that to movie of so as it is done in a of of the a from the for or of a by or in the course of teaching of a in a or to in the of a or the or the of is by of a that was not made this and that the for the or had to was not you have got to or the But that, it is so as the is around and you are in a Not all of this is starting to a a you that there is and wonder the course is ten of to that the find about it or it be of very and it is to honors students, that probably couldn't but you the me now you about the three I have in the starting with that which it anything but a and of all the courses I have ever this is the to to my my and who around to what a we are on the for the course is an is to be my that this not a less and not one more The is on the movie of the and is to be in the week the for or My to is that I read and the in the week and in the do a of twelve do more so and the ten is ten and a student twelve then ten is very not to at twelve from do more. The teaching of the is look upon all of this as an in to a short and to the point. are and and about always that and are then you are me just at the I am about to give you a We about the of things that were in the movie and that could be written and the are I some on what was or was not in the although we have a I look upon as and not just one of the My is to give and and to people do not to up but to watch the movie on this up on the that to coming to I to the of the movies have about also I to discuss the movies The it is a of that once you you do it on I there could be but this is the of where is to almost more it is that what I am to set up is the of professional in which you find in five on the on on He a with to from the to the He you to the What is the is it What we do to meet the the last but it is a That is what I am looking for in the student the it it so My is that at the of the the are not very are a lot it by the I should say that generally my are I am to a to bright, motivated I am and (Incidentally, in this course I to less by designated and more and with on a at That is one of the of a small my teaching that is the first thing I do in this I should say that we all But we also to it up and not to be there is always a movie on this in a with and and a and to for the I should say that the course to be a I to up and motivated and I with me right the and not just at and to about the great age me and my students, but to this to I the of people and the to are by who such a of what he and who on history as it was The of the week of the for the and by but a the This me to the of the course. I I movies to I think movies are of culture and of but very We but I to give a of generally rather people a of what is of as as that of in the century just don't do things but I to the and about movies and the from for one of my movies to is the and and me, the really as the The about this of is that it is directed by and is about the of or or the and of had been a and the of the The movie We have some great about might have been a and the made things so from the The great thing about a course this is that movies to the This last the that so many and are to on the of the of has much more and is movie for the of the a film of the What this you about a What about the who made in some sense in with is (and I don't say this in a people be about something so as the to what set to society and that, to a great of by we now have a much of the of the we did fifty years ago. But that is not the thing to about what in in the One that has always been for me is the in which people got up in the My for although from a that was very much the had to the is the same age as who also had to What did this mean to there in society For are we in of in the same the and to what The For a of what it is to be a there is is there a of the of not the on who we ever have a who had or at in had as a of My are not in the to go to or it to be the of the who up and who go there is the of the and of in the as a it to be a the the of that was in the look where that got could go on movies I certainly don't mean to that all movies all the movies I to or social or The I to to the is that movies be and as of society and of the I have to and and I do this is to influence what we I that I down and the and of the twentieth century and then this be the of My and I suspect that, you looked the years at my would as the I say that there has never been a movie with as but I think of one I also suspect that you looked at the would the film just have a that has never been But don't I was a in so I have you don't my choose This is my so I to the and of the course. The for the course in the first I to that this is not a course on the philosophy of I am not quite sure what that would although I am sure as a topic it and has been written But That is not my course. My course is philosophy and with issues the of with What are a is always on the of things the with ever new and wonder and the me and the with of What is there and do we We as think of this as to the and to the What I and do I the there are about about and about are a of about and and about the and and also are three movies I have that have to do with and and so is the film about a and is from the of the the the to a and a who on the very there such a thing as the and so what is there really a or are we just is the film about a the or of a who in of to for is this do we the ever would we to of a would you rather go the or the all the we the same and in as in is the film This movie is about a by the who is at but in the to it is made very But there is a lot to suggest that at of the in a We have the that in the do you you are and do you from great of art always have some new and so are for as as also is as is as an of what to as a This last I taught the course was just as the from State were a of the of the course I was and to this rather the as we the of and in the of what to you in This with the of another movie I film about a who is at and at is a topic in and my professional and I to it as it my history and philosophy of program has an undergraduate has an undergraduate course on and film, and so I don't do quite so much on in my course. One film to the as it is the The the and all and the in the at the of the and with the of very now had the and the was is a on science, of and and the of in the of The is about an would from always look who to that the that be are really with and we had have been the and to that the of is in an point. really such a there more a of with the what is for the the a to be is that for all that the has to about of it is the of the who is as the and of The also by and to is the is to be for more on we one of the of the who the to go to the and it to not by the the One of is that the was on the of the are many great movies in but for teaching and and not on but with about a to the he the of the is great for issues to do with the of or is it a it a which we could in from on the it a to think you could or the movie What of with in you got with the in the not a although it might be I particularly based on a by the and public as a in it some issues about the of and we would movie I this is the one that from the also some about the and topic it is to my much on and to and my and I are in the where is never from the however, to go with the so I my with one or of the and I to more the social and in society and it with science, then the film to is the This is a of the of the based on and the based on I am not sure that it has an lot to do with the it is probably more a for the it was written and the was the of of in But it is great to watch in and it has a by the is to the of the for teaching is by about something takes so be but on of the great but not the however, in we are about the of in I the of the I am to the with is to at with as and and so or to at for with in years actually as a he was at the of but he was as he was he was very people just have in of the from some very are and the are and and the are and is much about the of for the I think the of is more in the the of is of the of the on to the and the The is This film the of a and from the and at to from the the of or of it the and the of a of and the course all of my think that movie in and be made in such a the more was not After the not one of could that movie in anything but and a in the very and do so much more the very and the a and a of I do have to be I the with movies do to in that although I am always to a film, I don't do much in that My by is The of of based on the of and the as the of The to my that do you it something really or is it always something by people to a or to the past for the of the really a or was who was by the as a was for a my is as as the are in that about a are of I have The to by the is a of the that rather professional it the of the of or it a of a there an to that and it might the of be there such a thing as an of the movie I have some of is The to for a he did not the or at a What would it mean to say that he What is the of it sense to say that for the of of you don't really think that of this really is a great We that great by from a up and a in the but not the to The the very film by but in is more a of the in the the down to to is and by and then from the up the movie got very about all of The is that the from is as a (a of at We are that the is as as is is for the now to the of my great don't as as I don't at But the and was a was it in that to be But to be was very I have I was in my in the and it was A I should made somewhat more to the I (a in the of to the you were you got three not the and on to the on on the the for was one week's was you had to do on then you were to and watch the first or and at The that be a and not of the at the we called The the was was in of a first the who would at a with up to the movies. me in and I got now and but it was My was made just but in the there was a program on that movies. The great thing about to the movies on a was that it was so an one in would that you would do it and so there were on the first was at it that you the of a in my The to A of was (and The with it on a for the to but I think is more all was was so short that he would on an a as the of the that and the in the of the of for me has a on the the to from my all great is of He the as and as who are to a go of in the of from the to as by and to and But past is The a on the to and the and the he the he he really and he is to with a from or a a you on to and there more in the We are left with the is not just a great is a great is a great is in it a of and at a then do we do what we The has in with and the is The The he to be The would be for to take it the who are a lot more would to of He what he do for the of and then A do what a But the has a do what a the is has to be what he of the movies I in my course I find I more or three I go with at and I a that about I take so many of the and But I watch and is a movie and it is so in right down at once to the of we do what we I have a movie up in and that take from on He would it is of the of with the New York I was to a film to and discuss with The New York I to an is for me, my for movies to be much I for to my or I don't say movies, are always completely from all of the would be A might of you the New York that he the of I or I should I the of he to the movies is not first and foremost an what is or right it is or right for rather you have so much on this go to the movies you you to be That my of movies. I as it I just about one of the movies that just and I have of One movie that I and do watch and is film, The by the first in and then in it the of of in The film as a an and then the the in the of the in who in from to the and had with the have much more in with with the of he is to the who is a so The in he with a who has a and three in the This movie is a to the the and but of the made just a years movies as of a that with the much movie of a about a who a to the of it of the that is the and a he on the film a of right at the we are that the is one of who in the never and is in a I should however, that I am a of a my is not really as of the is my of a great of art that is the would have that this is an something is as then it be he or you of The is about although also about something on from by or by people who not of a made at the of the I in as a to the to a film with such a and be great don't always to movies, but another I have done with more as a was on The of a the movie about the and the of the The the movie looking for by and To a the film of the about a and in the South the three movies we toward and issues to do with and it it this then mean that it is not and just a of I think The is a great movie and quite for some of the movies he was to I don't of a I find quite I find the in of the more in a for me, To a is all a I an for the generally I find a He is in and I were to to do something on I might of the for on with I am not much of one for a are not quite my But the great thing about is that screen is not all is an to that on the this in where he the in the of the movie to the of the first of the we in are one and the same But that the I to a but the one I on is I always on it the My is that I was at the and and you are to be then is a to as the of in a is in a great movie and a one for a course in A with a is to looking the and of He a the of and the is and on the of is but are there not the the with there is a to this is about from the the and to the the people always this not in a but also in the that he for should that this and is quite of are coming to the of the course. We have with and and are I to the a This is the we are just fun, but the we is we movies. do we and and of it to this of I have a number of at this of but last around I and on a by the the has been many with and The I was made ten years in just the in Hollywood and much of the of the movies of that in the as the who takes a and and as the film really is and What I find is the from the (a much with the first which has and a of and the a that is so as to for the with the who and the who the who but the of all of of and about and much more. the movie is and also as we the of the and the this the of What something My movies are first the and in and of of are by a of the is an at the of the twentieth about and I am always quite to find that my find it so the in for the the that in the with the movie is the and on the from a as a of the in and an where meet a with a for and for is just such a and about to be a but who he a of is by a and has the idea of and then the and for the of the of much to not all to the up in what something do we at and don't to importantly, do we find a of is at the of of we would not find a of for that looking down on people in some is more a of that, in the of that is to a there be something which the find is an from the of a I suspect that and rather to the first we look down on the as But my on the last of the which my for the in the of is with he at the of a in he is a He gives all of the should not take the that he and a To which to by of the is upon I in the and in the and in one would be on the I choose a movie that is for and at the give a course are the week so there is or I have The at the and at to me for the a something called of My movie I watch the is so much of my that I am to find that of my have never remember the first I made a in to the and got We it this last and I was at it there are the the in the the the of the is the of the the an offer he don't my coming of that with just in my not not the in the of is the certainly that one the But the thing about the movie is the of the of from a who to do with the to as the new all of the of and to is at that you what a great art form be and it is in as he of did do is it to rather me and give it to me week and I it and it to you the week
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".