MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2158939050 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod63.1.2

Models of Luteinization1

2000· review· en· W2158939050 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce D. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCorpus luteumIntracellularCell biologyParacrine signallingTheca internaOvarian follicleEndocrinologyInternal medicineGranulosa cellCellOvaryReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Luteinization is essential to the success of early gestation. It is the process by which elements of the ovarian follicle, usually including both theca interna and granulosa cells, are provoked by the ovulatory stimulus to develop into the corpus luteum. Although there are significant species differences in luteinization, some elements pervade, including the morphological and functional differentiation to produce and secrete progesterone. There is evidence that luteinization results in granulosa cell exit from the cell cycle. The mechanisms that appear to control luteinization include intracellular signalling pathways, cell adhesion factors, intracellular cholesterol and oxysterols, and perhaps progesterone itself as a paracrine or intracrine regulator. Cell models of luteinization, along with some of the conflicting observations on the luteinization process, are discussed in this review.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations194
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207