Variation of Seed Dormancy and After-ripening in Tetraploid Wheat (Triticum durum, T. turgidum, T. turanicum, T. carthlicum, T. polonicum)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In western Canada, durum wheat cultivars (Triticum durum) have low to moderate levels of seed dormancy and are susceptible to pre-harvest sprouting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dormancy level of Canadian durum wheat cultivars and to identify tetraploid wheat accessions with elevated levels of seed dormancy. First, the level of seed dormancy and length of after-ripening of 17 North American durum wheat cultivars were evaluated. The plants were grown under field conditions in 1995 and 1996, harvested at maturity (Zadok’s Growth Stage 92, ZGS 92), dried at room temperature for one week, and assessed for level of seed dormancy over seven weeks of after-ripening at 20°C. Seed dormancy was characterized by the extent of germination at 20°C. The results indicated that five durum cultivars exhibited moderate levels of seed dormancy at maturity while the remaining cultivars were non-dormant. Likewise, a rapid loss of dormancy (within 2-3 weeks of after-ripening) was characteristic of all durum cultivars. In a second experiment, 78 accessions of T. turgidum, T. turanicum, T. carthlicum, T. polonicum, and T. durum from the USDA germplasm collection grown under field conditions in 1995 and 1996 were evaluated for seed dormancy with the idea of identifying potential sources of increased seed dormancy. At ZGS 92, eighteen accessions were classified as dormant. Accession 93282 was the only highly dormant genotype in this study. The seven most dormant accessions, identified in two years of field tests, were tested for length of the dormancy period. Accession 93-282 was the only genotype that had a longer period of dormancy than the durum cultivar, Kyle. The intensity of seed dormancy was quantified at five germination temperatures. A dormancy index was calculated from germination data at 10 and 20°C. The dormancy indices of tetraploid accessions 93-62 and 93-177 were 37% higher than that of the durum cultivar Kyle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".