Exploring hearing aid use in older women through narratives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explored experiences surrounding hearing aid use and non-use in older women with hearing loss. A narrative approach was used to gain an in-depth understanding of the meaning and contextual issues that impact upon the adaptation process of older adults and their transitions in using hearing devices. Four women over the age of sixty who were identified as being consistent hearing aid users took part in three face-to-face interviews. biographic-narrative-interview guiding framework was used to gather data in this study. Data were analyzed both holistically and thematically from a phenomenological perspective to identify the meaning and essence of the participants’ experiences. The results revealed an overarching theme of meaningful participation in life situations and events that were linked to purposeful use and non-use of hearing aids. Barriers and facilitators related to participation, which in turn affect hearing aid use and acceptance, were uncovered. The results of this study have implications for audiologic research, and practice.SumarioEste estudio exploró las experiencias alrededor del uso o no uso de auxiliares auditivos por ancianas con pérdidas auditivas. Se usaron las narraciones como enfoque, para lograr la comprensión exhaustiva del significado y de los aspectos contextuales que impactan el proceso de adaptación de los adultos mayores y su transición en el uso de instrumentos auditivos. Tomaron parte en tres entrevistas cara-a-cara, cuatro mujeres mayores de sesenta años, identificadas como usuarias consistentes de auxiliares auditivos. Se usó el marco guía de de entrevistas biográficas-narrativas para obtener los datos de este estudio. Estos datos fueron analizados tanto holística como temáticamente, desde una perspectiva fenomenológica para identificar el significado y la esencia de las experiencias de las participantes. Los resultados revelaron un tema enarcado de participación significativa en situaciones de vida y eventos ligados al uso propositivo o al no uso de auxiliares auditivos. Las barreras y los facilitadores relacionados con la participación, que afectan en sus momentos el uso y la aceptación del auxiliar auditivo, no fueron cubiertos. Los resultados de este estudio tienen implicaciones para la investigación y la práctica audiológica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".