MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159040769 · doi:10.1109/icdcsw.2009.78

Fast, Seamless Rekeying In Wireless Sensor Networks

2009· article· en· W2159040769 on OpenAlexaff
Subir Biswas, Md. Mahbubul Haque, Saeed Rashwand, Jelena Mišić

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRekeyingComputer scienceComputer networkBackupKey managementWireless sensor networkKey (lock)Base stationProbabilistic logicScheme (mathematics)Key distribution in wireless sensor networksWirelessNode (physics)Distributed computingWireless networkComputer securityTelecommunicationsEncryptionDatabaseEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extend the probabilistic key-based approach for wireless sensor networks concerning the slow rekeying and path key reestablishment processes. By introducing a novel, energy efficient, distributed, and faster scheme, we attempt to replace the existing ordinary rekeying method of probabilistic key management scheme through a deterministic algorithm that works on both the base station and on each communicating pair of sensor nodes. The node predetermines the backup link key for a future key revocation and switches to the backup key when needed without further interrupting the base station or the key server. This scheme assures high level of security in rekeying operation, and at the same time reduces the rekeying cost very significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSecurity in Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207